rat ed1 cd68 primary antibody Search Results


96
Vector Laboratories rat anti rabbit antibody for cd68
Rat Anti Rabbit Antibody For Cd68, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti rabbit antibody for cd68/product/Vector Laboratories
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti rabbit antibody for cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad mouse anti rat ed1
FIG. 1. Light micrographs showing sec- tions of the epididymis of the Brown Nor- way rat stained with an antibody for monocytes-macrophages <t>(ED1).</t> A–C) Cor- pus, D–F) distal cauda. A, D) 3 mo, B, E) 18 mo with numerous spermatozoa in the lumen, C, F) 18 mo with occasional sper- matozoa in the lumen. lu, Lumen; it, inter- tubular space; p, principal cells; b, basal cells; c, clear cells; bm, basement mem- brane. Arrows, ED1-positive cells; aster- isks, halo cells. Scale bar, A–F 5 64 mm.
Mouse Anti Rat Ed1, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti rat ed1/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti rat ed1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GeneTex fitc-conjugated rat antimouse cd68 fa-11 clone gtx43518
FIG. 1. Light micrographs showing sec- tions of the epididymis of the Brown Nor- way rat stained with an antibody for monocytes-macrophages <t>(ED1).</t> A–C) Cor- pus, D–F) distal cauda. A, D) 3 mo, B, E) 18 mo with numerous spermatozoa in the lumen, C, F) 18 mo with occasional sper- matozoa in the lumen. lu, Lumen; it, inter- tubular space; p, principal cells; b, basal cells; c, clear cells; bm, basement mem- brane. Arrows, ED1-positive cells; aster- isks, halo cells. Scale bar, A–F 5 64 mm.
Fitc Conjugated Rat Antimouse Cd68 Fa 11 Clone Gtx43518, supplied by GeneTex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fitc-conjugated rat antimouse cd68 fa-11 clone gtx43518/product/GeneTex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitc-conjugated rat antimouse cd68 fa-11 clone gtx43518 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad rat anti mouse cd68
FIG. 1. Light micrographs showing sec- tions of the epididymis of the Brown Nor- way rat stained with an antibody for monocytes-macrophages <t>(ED1).</t> A–C) Cor- pus, D–F) distal cauda. A, D) 3 mo, B, E) 18 mo with numerous spermatozoa in the lumen, C, F) 18 mo with occasional sper- matozoa in the lumen. lu, Lumen; it, inter- tubular space; p, principal cells; b, basal cells; c, clear cells; bm, basement mem- brane. Arrows, ED1-positive cells; aster- isks, halo cells. Scale bar, A–F 5 64 mm.
Rat Anti Mouse Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti mouse cd68/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti mouse cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Serotech Inc mouse anti rat cd68 antibody mca341r
A , B show the affected right sciatic nerve from the CCI leg shown in stained with <t>anti-CD68</t> antibody to reveal the presence of macrophages infiltrating the nerve. C , D <t>CD68</t> <t>positive</t> cells are not present in the left leg (contralateral to surgery ) of the same CCI animal. E , F show a nerve from a separate CCI animal that also exhibits infiltration of CD68 positive cells. The boxed area is enlarged to reveal the granular cytoplasm (black arrow) of the macrophages, indicative of the presence of the nanoemulsion. Sham surgical sciatic nerve and non-surgical control sciatic nerve do not exhibit any CD68 positive cells ( G , H ) and ( I , J ). The fluorescent images A, C, G, and I were all acquired at the same sitting with the exact same image acquisition parameters. Macrophages grown in cell culture take up the nanoemulsion, exhibited as particles evident by both confocal fluorescence emissions 700–850 nm of NIR label (DiR) ( K , M ) as well as transmitted light ( L , N ).
Mouse Anti Rat Cd68 Antibody Mca341r, supplied by Serotech Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti rat cd68 antibody mca341r/product/Serotech Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti rat cd68 antibody mca341r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals cd68
(A) α-SMA and <t>CD68</t> immunostaining of representative sections from Group 1 and Group 2. Scale bar=100 μM. Higher magnification images are at 40X. (B) Quantification of α-SMA (intimal region) and CD68 (intimal and medial regions) expression from AVF-artery and AVF-vein. N=3–4 in each group. *p<0.05, **p<0.001. An unpaired t-test was used to test for statistical differences between AVF without angioplasty and AVF with angioplasty groups.
Cd68, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd68/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Danaher Inc mouse monoclonal anti cd68
(A) α-SMA and <t>CD68</t> immunostaining of representative sections from Group 1 and Group 2. Scale bar=100 μM. Higher magnification images are at 40X. (B) Quantification of α-SMA (intimal region) and CD68 (intimal and medial regions) expression from AVF-artery and AVF-vein. N=3–4 in each group. *p<0.05, **p<0.001. An unpaired t-test was used to test for statistical differences between AVF without angioplasty and AVF with angioplasty groups.
Mouse Monoclonal Anti Cd68, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti cd68/product/Danaher Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson pe rat anti-mouse cd68
Effect of L2 and BNP on macrophage polarization in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. ( a ) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the variable macrophage distribution of M1-like macrophages <t>(CD68</t> + /CD206 − cells, Q1 population) and M2-like macrophages <t>(CD68</t> + /CD206 + /MRC-1, Q2 population) in control and treated cells. ( b , c ) Effect of L2 on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. ( d , e ) Effect of BNP on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without L2 or BNP (0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 ng/mL) and isatin (0.1 mM), added 20 min earlier. ( f ) M2/M1 ratio in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. The subtypes of macrophages were identified by analyzing profiles of cell surface markers by FACS. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages were identified as CD68 + /CD206 ࢤ cells and M2-like macrophages assessed by double immunolabeling of CD68 and CD206/MRC-1 in control and treated cells, and the data were analyzed by BD CellQuestPro software. All results were obtained from duplicate experiments. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. corresponding control LPS group; $ p < 0.05, $$ p < 0.01, $$$ p < 0.001 vs. L2 corresponding group; †† p < 0.01 vs. group unstimulated with LPS.
Pe Rat Anti Mouse Cd68, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe rat anti-mouse cd68/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe rat anti-mouse cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cusabio elisa kit
Effect of L2 and BNP on macrophage polarization in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. ( a ) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the variable macrophage distribution of M1-like macrophages <t>(CD68</t> + /CD206 − cells, Q1 population) and M2-like macrophages <t>(CD68</t> + /CD206 + /MRC-1, Q2 population) in control and treated cells. ( b , c ) Effect of L2 on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. ( d , e ) Effect of BNP on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without L2 or BNP (0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 ng/mL) and isatin (0.1 mM), added 20 min earlier. ( f ) M2/M1 ratio in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. The subtypes of macrophages were identified by analyzing profiles of cell surface markers by FACS. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages were identified as CD68 + /CD206 ࢤ cells and M2-like macrophages assessed by double immunolabeling of CD68 and CD206/MRC-1 in control and treated cells, and the data were analyzed by BD CellQuestPro software. All results were obtained from duplicate experiments. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. corresponding control LPS group; $ p < 0.05, $$ p < 0.01, $$$ p < 0.001 vs. L2 corresponding group; †† p < 0.01 vs. group unstimulated with LPS.
Elisa Kit, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/elisa kit/product/Cusabio
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech mouse cd68 28058 1 ap
Effect of L2 and BNP on macrophage polarization in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. ( a ) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the variable macrophage distribution of M1-like macrophages <t>(CD68</t> + /CD206 − cells, Q1 population) and M2-like macrophages <t>(CD68</t> + /CD206 + /MRC-1, Q2 population) in control and treated cells. ( b , c ) Effect of L2 on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. ( d , e ) Effect of BNP on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without L2 or BNP (0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 ng/mL) and isatin (0.1 mM), added 20 min earlier. ( f ) M2/M1 ratio in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. The subtypes of macrophages were identified by analyzing profiles of cell surface markers by FACS. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages were identified as CD68 + /CD206 ࢤ cells and M2-like macrophages assessed by double immunolabeling of CD68 and CD206/MRC-1 in control and treated cells, and the data were analyzed by BD CellQuestPro software. All results were obtained from duplicate experiments. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. corresponding control LPS group; $ p < 0.05, $$ p < 0.01, $$$ p < 0.001 vs. L2 corresponding group; †† p < 0.01 vs. group unstimulated with LPS.
Mouse Cd68 28058 1 Ap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cd68 28058 1 ap/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse cd68 28058 1 ap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti cd68
Immunohistological evaluation of the CSD lesions in the CSS and non‐CSS groups. (A–N) Representative figures of immunohistochemistry for CD3‐ (A, B), CD20‐ (C, D), CD56‐ (E, F), <t>CD68‐</t> (G, H), CD138‐ (I, J), myeloperoxidase‐ (K, L), and tryptase‐positive (M, N) cells in the CSD lesions in both groups (scale bar: 50 µm). (O–U) Immunopathological comparison between the CSS and the non‐CSS groups. CSD, cesarean scar defect; CSS, cesarean scar syndrome
Anti Cd68, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd68/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio-Rad macrophages
Nuclear translocation of inflammatory transcription factors nuclear factor interleukin 6 (NF-IL6) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in cultured dorsal root ganglia (DRG) cells. Immunocytochemistry was performed in cultured DRG cells obtained from PBS- and LPS-treated rats to examine activation of inflammatory transcription factors. ( A ) In CD-68-positive <t>macrophages</t> (green) an enhanced nuclear signal of NF-IL6 (red) was detectable in rats treated with LPS ( A.2 ) compared to controls ( A.1 ). Calculating the mean nuclear intensity of the signal in the area of the nucleus (blue), a significant increase is detectable ( A.3 ). ( B ) The STAT3 signal (red) was mainly detectable in MAP-positive neurons (green) of DRG cultures of LPS-treated animals ( B.2 ) and controls ( B.1 ). Calculating the mean nuclear intensity of the signal in the area of neuronal nuclei (blue), a significant difference is detectable ( B.3 ). Bars represent the mean ± SEM. ‘ n ’ represents the number of investigated cells of the respective cell type. Scale bars present 10 µm. **: p < 0.01; ****: p < 0.0001. PBS: phosphate buffered saline, LPS: lipopolysaccharide.
Macrophages, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/macrophages/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FIG. 1. Light micrographs showing sec- tions of the epididymis of the Brown Nor- way rat stained with an antibody for monocytes-macrophages (ED1). A–C) Cor- pus, D–F) distal cauda. A, D) 3 mo, B, E) 18 mo with numerous spermatozoa in the lumen, C, F) 18 mo with occasional sper- matozoa in the lumen. lu, Lumen; it, inter- tubular space; p, principal cells; b, basal cells; c, clear cells; bm, basement mem- brane. Arrows, ED1-positive cells; aster- isks, halo cells. Scale bar, A–F 5 64 mm.

Journal: Biology of reproduction

Article Title: Distribution of immune cells in the epididymis of the aging Brown Norway rat is segment-specific and related to the luminal content.

doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.3.705

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIG. 1. Light micrographs showing sec- tions of the epididymis of the Brown Nor- way rat stained with an antibody for monocytes-macrophages (ED1). A–C) Cor- pus, D–F) distal cauda. A, D) 3 mo, B, E) 18 mo with numerous spermatozoa in the lumen, C, F) 18 mo with occasional sper- matozoa in the lumen. lu, Lumen; it, inter- tubular space; p, principal cells; b, basal cells; c, clear cells; bm, basement mem- brane. Arrows, ED1-positive cells; aster- isks, halo cells. Scale bar, A–F 5 64 mm.

Article Snippet: Mouse anti-rat ED1 (Serotec USA, Washington, DC) was used at a dilution 1/100; this antibody recognizes a cytoplasmic antigen in monocytes and most macrophages.

Techniques: Staining

FIG. 5. Light micrographs showing sec- tions of the corpus of the epididymis of Brown Norway rats. A, C) Three mo; B, D) 18 mo. Section stained with an antibody for A and B GST Yf and C and D ED1. Clear arrows, basal cells; dark arrows, ED1-positive cells; other labels as in Fig- ure 1. Scale bar, A–D 5 64 mm.

Journal: Biology of reproduction

Article Title: Distribution of immune cells in the epididymis of the aging Brown Norway rat is segment-specific and related to the luminal content.

doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.3.705

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIG. 5. Light micrographs showing sec- tions of the corpus of the epididymis of Brown Norway rats. A, C) Three mo; B, D) 18 mo. Section stained with an antibody for A and B GST Yf and C and D ED1. Clear arrows, basal cells; dark arrows, ED1-positive cells; other labels as in Fig- ure 1. Scale bar, A–D 5 64 mm.

Article Snippet: Mouse anti-rat ED1 (Serotec USA, Washington, DC) was used at a dilution 1/100; this antibody recognizes a cytoplasmic antigen in monocytes and most macrophages.

Techniques: Staining

A , B show the affected right sciatic nerve from the CCI leg shown in stained with anti-CD68 antibody to reveal the presence of macrophages infiltrating the nerve. C , D CD68 positive cells are not present in the left leg (contralateral to surgery ) of the same CCI animal. E , F show a nerve from a separate CCI animal that also exhibits infiltration of CD68 positive cells. The boxed area is enlarged to reveal the granular cytoplasm (black arrow) of the macrophages, indicative of the presence of the nanoemulsion. Sham surgical sciatic nerve and non-surgical control sciatic nerve do not exhibit any CD68 positive cells ( G , H ) and ( I , J ). The fluorescent images A, C, G, and I were all acquired at the same sitting with the exact same image acquisition parameters. Macrophages grown in cell culture take up the nanoemulsion, exhibited as particles evident by both confocal fluorescence emissions 700–850 nm of NIR label (DiR) ( K , M ) as well as transmitted light ( L , N ).

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Imaging Neuroinflammation In Vivo in a Neuropathic Pain Rat Model with Near-Infrared Fluorescence and 19 F Magnetic Resonance

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090589

Figure Lengend Snippet: A , B show the affected right sciatic nerve from the CCI leg shown in stained with anti-CD68 antibody to reveal the presence of macrophages infiltrating the nerve. C , D CD68 positive cells are not present in the left leg (contralateral to surgery ) of the same CCI animal. E , F show a nerve from a separate CCI animal that also exhibits infiltration of CD68 positive cells. The boxed area is enlarged to reveal the granular cytoplasm (black arrow) of the macrophages, indicative of the presence of the nanoemulsion. Sham surgical sciatic nerve and non-surgical control sciatic nerve do not exhibit any CD68 positive cells ( G , H ) and ( I , J ). The fluorescent images A, C, G, and I were all acquired at the same sitting with the exact same image acquisition parameters. Macrophages grown in cell culture take up the nanoemulsion, exhibited as particles evident by both confocal fluorescence emissions 700–850 nm of NIR label (DiR) ( K , M ) as well as transmitted light ( L , N ).

Article Snippet: In separate immunohistochemical experiments using comparable protocols, the recovered control, sham and CCI sciatic nerves were prepared for examination using mouse anti rat CD68 antibody (MCA341R, AbD Serotech, Raleigh, NC) and Alexa fluor 488 donkey anti mouse secondary antibody (A-21202, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to assess the presence of macrophages that infiltrate the nerve.

Techniques: Staining, Control, Cell Culture, Fluorescence

(A) α-SMA and CD68 immunostaining of representative sections from Group 1 and Group 2. Scale bar=100 μM. Higher magnification images are at 40X. (B) Quantification of α-SMA (intimal region) and CD68 (intimal and medial regions) expression from AVF-artery and AVF-vein. N=3–4 in each group. *p<0.05, **p<0.001. An unpaired t-test was used to test for statistical differences between AVF without angioplasty and AVF with angioplasty groups.

Journal: Journal of vascular research

Article Title: A Novel Model of Balloon Angioplasty Injury in Rat Arteriovenous Fistula

doi: 10.1159/000507080

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) α-SMA and CD68 immunostaining of representative sections from Group 1 and Group 2. Scale bar=100 μM. Higher magnification images are at 40X. (B) Quantification of α-SMA (intimal region) and CD68 (intimal and medial regions) expression from AVF-artery and AVF-vein. N=3–4 in each group. *p<0.05, **p<0.001. An unpaired t-test was used to test for statistical differences between AVF without angioplasty and AVF with angioplasty groups.

Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical Analysis Paraffin embedded arterial and venous sections were evaluated to identify the cells contributing to the vascular remodeling following balloon angioplasty. α-SMA (14-9760-82, Invitrogen) and CD68 (NB600–985, Novus Biologicals) primary antibodies were used to verify the presence of smooth muscle cell phenotype and inflammatory cells respectively. α-SMA expression in the intimal region and CD68 expression in both medial and intimal regions of AVF vessels were quantified using Cellsense Dimension Software (Olympus Life Science) on digital photographs taken at a final magnification of 20X.

Techniques: Immunostaining, Expressing

Effect of L2 and BNP on macrophage polarization in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. ( a ) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the variable macrophage distribution of M1-like macrophages (CD68 + /CD206 − cells, Q1 population) and M2-like macrophages (CD68 + /CD206 + /MRC-1, Q2 population) in control and treated cells. ( b , c ) Effect of L2 on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. ( d , e ) Effect of BNP on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without L2 or BNP (0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 ng/mL) and isatin (0.1 mM), added 20 min earlier. ( f ) M2/M1 ratio in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. The subtypes of macrophages were identified by analyzing profiles of cell surface markers by FACS. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages were identified as CD68 + /CD206 ࢤ cells and M2-like macrophages assessed by double immunolabeling of CD68 and CD206/MRC-1 in control and treated cells, and the data were analyzed by BD CellQuestPro software. All results were obtained from duplicate experiments. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. corresponding control LPS group; $ p < 0.05, $$ p < 0.01, $$$ p < 0.001 vs. L2 corresponding group; †† p < 0.01 vs. group unstimulated with LPS.

Journal: Toxins

Article Title: Natriuretic-like Peptide Lebetin 2 Mediates M2 Macrophage Polarization in LPS-Activated RAW264.7 Cells in an IL-10-Dependent Manner

doi: 10.3390/toxins15040298

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of L2 and BNP on macrophage polarization in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. ( a ) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the variable macrophage distribution of M1-like macrophages (CD68 + /CD206 − cells, Q1 population) and M2-like macrophages (CD68 + /CD206 + /MRC-1, Q2 population) in control and treated cells. ( b , c ) Effect of L2 on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. ( d , e ) Effect of BNP on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without L2 or BNP (0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 ng/mL) and isatin (0.1 mM), added 20 min earlier. ( f ) M2/M1 ratio in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. The subtypes of macrophages were identified by analyzing profiles of cell surface markers by FACS. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages were identified as CD68 + /CD206 ࢤ cells and M2-like macrophages assessed by double immunolabeling of CD68 and CD206/MRC-1 in control and treated cells, and the data were analyzed by BD CellQuestPro software. All results were obtained from duplicate experiments. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. corresponding control LPS group; $ p < 0.05, $$ p < 0.01, $$$ p < 0.001 vs. L2 corresponding group; †† p < 0.01 vs. group unstimulated with LPS.

Article Snippet: RAW264.7 macrophage polarization was detected after treatment with L2 and BNP by flow cytometric profiling of specific surface marker expression, including CD68 for total macrophage population quantification and CD206/MRC-1 for M2-like macrophage quantification using PE Rat Anti-Mouse CD68 and Alexa Fluor ® 647 Rat Anti-Mouse CD206 (BD BioScience, San Jose, CA, USA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Immunolabeling, Software

Effect of L2 on macrophage polarization in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells after interleukin-10 inhibition. ( a , b ) Effect of interlekin-10 (IL-10) on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without exogenous IL-10 (0, 10 and 20 ng/mL). ( c , d ) Effect of L2 on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression after IL-10 inhibition. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without L2 (0, 0.4 or 0.8 ng/mL) and IL-10 inhibitor at 10 µg/mL, added 20 min earlier. ( e ) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the variable macrophage distribution of M1-like macrophages (CD68 + /CD206 − cells, Q1 population) and M2-like macrophages (CD68 + /CD206 + /MRC-1, Q2 population) in control and treated cells. The subtypes of macrophages were identified by analyzing profiles of cell surface markers by FACS. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages were identified as CD68 + /CD206 − cells and M2-like macrophages assessed by double immunolabeling of CD68 and CD206/MRC-1 in control and treated cells, and the data were analyzed by BD CellQuestPro software. All results were obtained from duplicate experiments. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. corresponding control LPS group; $ p < 0.05, $$$ p < 0.001 vs. L2 corresponding group.

Journal: Toxins

Article Title: Natriuretic-like Peptide Lebetin 2 Mediates M2 Macrophage Polarization in LPS-Activated RAW264.7 Cells in an IL-10-Dependent Manner

doi: 10.3390/toxins15040298

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of L2 on macrophage polarization in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells after interleukin-10 inhibition. ( a , b ) Effect of interlekin-10 (IL-10) on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without exogenous IL-10 (0, 10 and 20 ng/mL). ( c , d ) Effect of L2 on M1 and M2 macrophage subtype expression after IL-10 inhibition. Cells were obtained after challenging RAW264.7 cells with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h followed by 48 h treatment with or without L2 (0, 0.4 or 0.8 ng/mL) and IL-10 inhibitor at 10 µg/mL, added 20 min earlier. ( e ) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the variable macrophage distribution of M1-like macrophages (CD68 + /CD206 − cells, Q1 population) and M2-like macrophages (CD68 + /CD206 + /MRC-1, Q2 population) in control and treated cells. The subtypes of macrophages were identified by analyzing profiles of cell surface markers by FACS. Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages were identified as CD68 + /CD206 − cells and M2-like macrophages assessed by double immunolabeling of CD68 and CD206/MRC-1 in control and treated cells, and the data were analyzed by BD CellQuestPro software. All results were obtained from duplicate experiments. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. corresponding control LPS group; $ p < 0.05, $$$ p < 0.001 vs. L2 corresponding group.

Article Snippet: RAW264.7 macrophage polarization was detected after treatment with L2 and BNP by flow cytometric profiling of specific surface marker expression, including CD68 for total macrophage population quantification and CD206/MRC-1 for M2-like macrophage quantification using PE Rat Anti-Mouse CD68 and Alexa Fluor ® 647 Rat Anti-Mouse CD206 (BD BioScience, San Jose, CA, USA).

Techniques: Inhibition, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Immunolabeling, Software

Immunohistological evaluation of the CSD lesions in the CSS and non‐CSS groups. (A–N) Representative figures of immunohistochemistry for CD3‐ (A, B), CD20‐ (C, D), CD56‐ (E, F), CD68‐ (G, H), CD138‐ (I, J), myeloperoxidase‐ (K, L), and tryptase‐positive (M, N) cells in the CSD lesions in both groups (scale bar: 50 µm). (O–U) Immunopathological comparison between the CSS and the non‐CSS groups. CSD, cesarean scar defect; CSS, cesarean scar syndrome

Journal: Reproductive Medicine and Biology

Article Title: Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome

doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12431

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistological evaluation of the CSD lesions in the CSS and non‐CSS groups. (A–N) Representative figures of immunohistochemistry for CD3‐ (A, B), CD20‐ (C, D), CD56‐ (E, F), CD68‐ (G, H), CD138‐ (I, J), myeloperoxidase‐ (K, L), and tryptase‐positive (M, N) cells in the CSD lesions in both groups (scale bar: 50 µm). (O–U) Immunopathological comparison between the CSS and the non‐CSS groups. CSD, cesarean scar defect; CSS, cesarean scar syndrome

Article Snippet: Regarding the primary antibodies, rabbit anti‐tryptase was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (mAb#19523) and diluted at 1:500; mouse anti‐CD3 (#413241), anti‐CD20 (#422441), anti‐CD68 (#413791), anti‐CD138 (#413881), and anti‐myeloperoxidase (MPO) (#418261) were obtained from Nichirei Biosciences Inc. (Histofine Simple Stain MAX‐PO(M) kit series).

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry

Nuclear translocation of inflammatory transcription factors nuclear factor interleukin 6 (NF-IL6) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in cultured dorsal root ganglia (DRG) cells. Immunocytochemistry was performed in cultured DRG cells obtained from PBS- and LPS-treated rats to examine activation of inflammatory transcription factors. ( A ) In CD-68-positive macrophages (green) an enhanced nuclear signal of NF-IL6 (red) was detectable in rats treated with LPS ( A.2 ) compared to controls ( A.1 ). Calculating the mean nuclear intensity of the signal in the area of the nucleus (blue), a significant increase is detectable ( A.3 ). ( B ) The STAT3 signal (red) was mainly detectable in MAP-positive neurons (green) of DRG cultures of LPS-treated animals ( B.2 ) and controls ( B.1 ). Calculating the mean nuclear intensity of the signal in the area of neuronal nuclei (blue), a significant difference is detectable ( B.3 ). Bars represent the mean ± SEM. ‘ n ’ represents the number of investigated cells of the respective cell type. Scale bars present 10 µm. **: p < 0.01; ****: p < 0.0001. PBS: phosphate buffered saline, LPS: lipopolysaccharide.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: Systemic Lipopolysaccharide Challenge Induces Inflammatory Changes in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia: An Ex Vivo Study

doi: 10.3390/ijms232113124

Figure Lengend Snippet: Nuclear translocation of inflammatory transcription factors nuclear factor interleukin 6 (NF-IL6) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in cultured dorsal root ganglia (DRG) cells. Immunocytochemistry was performed in cultured DRG cells obtained from PBS- and LPS-treated rats to examine activation of inflammatory transcription factors. ( A ) In CD-68-positive macrophages (green) an enhanced nuclear signal of NF-IL6 (red) was detectable in rats treated with LPS ( A.2 ) compared to controls ( A.1 ). Calculating the mean nuclear intensity of the signal in the area of the nucleus (blue), a significant increase is detectable ( A.3 ). ( B ) The STAT3 signal (red) was mainly detectable in MAP-positive neurons (green) of DRG cultures of LPS-treated animals ( B.2 ) and controls ( B.1 ). Calculating the mean nuclear intensity of the signal in the area of neuronal nuclei (blue), a significant difference is detectable ( B.3 ). Bars represent the mean ± SEM. ‘ n ’ represents the number of investigated cells of the respective cell type. Scale bars present 10 µm. **: p < 0.01; ****: p < 0.0001. PBS: phosphate buffered saline, LPS: lipopolysaccharide.

Article Snippet: For immunocytochemical identification of cell types, the following monoclonal antibodies or polyclonal antisera were used: CD-68 for macrophages (mouse anti rat-CD-68; 1:1000; AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK) and microtubule-associated protein 2a+b for neurons (mouse AP-20 anti-MAP2a+b; 1:600; Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH).

Techniques: Translocation Assay, Cell Culture, Immunocytochemistry, Activation Assay, Saline